My point stands even if my examples were extreme. The idea I'm trying to get across is that the experience itself matters tremendously. If you're arguing that people's responses can be predicted in advance I'd ask why you think that is.
Note that I'm not saying people's behavior isn't often predictable, just that I don't buy that it's the case a majority of the time. You may see where I'm going with my question of why and if so I encourage you to finish the thought.
Yes, the act of prediction depends on experience, chicken/egg, etc etc. I may be reading your last comment incorrectly, it is late.
I agree, the consequence of current experience is foundational to the interpretation of all future experience, etc etc.
Before we get much farther into metaphysics, lets step back to the original question.
The person who posted it noted a pattern in her sexual behavior. The pattern being the desire to "bolt for the door after. " My analysis, and yes, personal experience, suggest that sex "illuminates" more emotions than it, as a physical act, may cause. The distinction there may seem minute, but I believe it is important. In fact, your own extreme example of someone dealing with abuse issues (your second "extreme example") supports this. The abuse issues were there (presumably) before the sex. And if the same fact pattern occurred with a person without those prior issues, the consequences would be far different.
My point was, that if after what is generally considered a "regular" sexual encounter (not involving a traumatic event) the person in question "feels like bolting for the door," especially if this holds as a pattern of behavior, then the feelings she experiences at that time were likely there prior to the sex, and the physical act merely brought them to the surface, rather than generated them. In other words - there's nothing wrong with sex, but she's got issues ;-)... who doesn't eh?
You dummy, that video is obviously not about sex. It's about secondary schools banning students from using cellphones. As a result of this, nobody was able to call 911.
Anything that can make any form of sexual encounter safer is good in my book. Ideally, for oral sex, I think the guy should wear a condom while the lady wear a dental dam to maximize the protection.
Come to think about it, anyone interested in making this the Official TalkSFU Safe Sex thread?
No, this one has already flooded with a ton of white noise. Start a new one with a good informative OP. Or I can if you don't want to.
Also, I'm confused by your description of using condoms and dental dams at the same time. Dental dams are only for oral, or am I missing something important?
Also, I'm confused by your description of using condoms and dental dams at the same time. Dental dams are only for oral, or am I missing something important?
Oh, DURING ORAL SEX, I think the guy should wear a condom while the lady wear a dental dam to maximize the protection. Did you miss the DURING ORAL SEX part?
Comments
Note that I'm not saying people's behavior isn't often predictable, just that I don't buy that it's the case a majority of the time. You may see where I'm going with my question of why and if so I encourage you to finish the thought.
I agree, the consequence of current experience is foundational to the interpretation of all future experience, etc etc.
Before we get much farther into metaphysics, lets step back to the original question.
The person who posted it noted a pattern in her sexual behavior. The pattern being the desire to "bolt for the door after. " My analysis, and yes, personal experience, suggest that sex "illuminates" more emotions than it, as a physical act, may cause. The distinction there may seem minute, but I believe it is important. In fact, your own extreme example of someone dealing with abuse issues (your second "extreme example") supports this. The abuse issues were there (presumably) before the sex. And if the same fact pattern occurred with a person without those prior issues, the consequences would be far different.
My point was, that if after what is generally considered a "regular" sexual encounter (not involving a traumatic event) the person in question "feels like bolting for the door," especially if this holds as a pattern of behavior, then the feelings she experiences at that time were likely there prior to the sex, and the physical act merely brought them to the surface, rather than generated them. In other words - there's nothing wrong with sex, but she's got issues ;-)... who doesn't eh?
lol
First attempt at sex has some magic to it though, even if you can't get it going.
i totally agree mammal?:confused:
lazyMAMMAL
You're trying to say "humans, women to be exact."
This video was shown on global tv. SRZ, sex is overrated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frHOZn3tpdQ
Come to think about it, anyone interested in making this the Official TalkSFU Safe Sex thread?
Also, I'm confused by your description of using condoms and dental dams at the same time. Dental dams are only for oral, or am I missing something important?