›
To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

anyone taken crim 103 with William Glackman?

echicken
edited March 2009 in General
hi everyone, i am still weighing whether i should take phil 100 or crim 103 in summer 09, and i cant find any rating of William Glackman in RMP. Anyone had a experience with him?

Thanksss:angel:

Comments

  • wh0whatwhere
    edited March 2009
    Take it with ANYONE other than Boyanowsky.
  • DaNoobie
    edited March 2009
    yah was just gonna say, cant be worse than Boyanowski
  • bleed.the.mannequin
    edited March 2009
    im taking it with glackman as well. heard bad things abt wong and boy.
  • iLLmAtic
    edited March 2009
    Are you talking about Distance Ed? I took 103 with him via distance ed and it was a pretty standard course. Weekly quizzes (only 3 mins to do them though, which was odd), 2 short essays (one is 4 pages, the other is 5 or 6), and a final exam. The final exam was pretty straight forward, focused mostly on key terms. If you have taken psych 100 and 102 (and remember stuff) it should help you a lot.

    Be sure to keep up with the readings, and try to persevere through the extremely dry text by Bartol and Bartol.
  • bleed.the.mannequin
    edited March 2009
    yh im doing it via DE.
    I took psych 100 but havent taken psych 102 yet. will it make a big difference?
  • iLLmAtic
    edited March 2009
    Nah, no big difference. Only thing is you probably won't recognize some (I would say minority) of the concepts discussed, and won't be able to learn them as quickly.
  • xxk1nky
    edited March 2009
    Just say no to Phil 100.
  • echicken
    edited March 2009
    guys thanks for the advice :beer:
    xxk1nky;50105 said:
    Just say no to Phil 100.
    i was planning to do a phil minor since there are both b-hum and b-sci...
    but then phil in sfu sounds ridiculous
  • JayDub
    edited March 2009
    echicken;50111 said:
    but then phil in sfu sounds ridiculous
    Fixed

Leave a Comment