To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Canada's Fucked!

edited November 2008 in General
Harper admitted today that we are going to have a deficit next year and that the country is already in a "technical recession." So yea, we're officially screwed until America's economy comes back which won't be for at least 2 or 3 years. Hopefully I can find a job after I graduate this semester :cry:
«1

Comments

  • edited November 2008
    fuck canada man go work in a sweatshop in china!
  • edited November 2008
    Be a WoW gold-farmer! Hooked on Farming Worked for Me!
  • edited November 2008
    How will this affect Co-op recruitment? It can sorta go both ways.
  • edited November 2008
    thank god for crim
    this means more more people will be committing crimes to pay their bills
  • IVTIVT
    edited November 2008
    "The six dollar steak?! Kitty, we're in a recession!"
  • edited November 2008
    lol its funny how people still voted for harper and the conservatives
  • edited November 2008
    i_like_hiking;41042 said:
    lol its funny how people still voted for harper and the conservatives
    Wow...do you think Harper had any way to prevent a global economic slowdown? He's not god

    The main problem is that so much of our economic activity is tied into America, so the real question is...how did people still vote for W. the second term in a row
  • edited November 2008
    Kevin M.;41047 said:
    Wow...do you think Harper had any way to prevent a global economic slowdown? He's not god

    The main problem is that so much of our economic activity is tied into America, so the real question is...how did people still vote for W. the second term in a row
    they were @ war, lookn @ history president always get reelected in a time of war
  • edited November 2008
    not saying that harper is god, just saying that harper's policies seem similar to bush's.

    harpernomics?
  • edited November 2008
    harper's policies are exactly bush's.
  • edited November 2008
    DAMNIT, GOD DAMNIT! What the hell? We hardly did anything the Americans did that screw up their economy and we STILL land ourselves in a recession, this is so unfair! As for a deficit, what the hell? Shouldn't Canada be loaded with the amount of tax the government take in? Besides, we never spend any money we don't have.
  • edited November 2008
    he actually blew a 13 billion dollar surplus in 30 months...
  • edited November 2008
    that's unfortunately the downside of having economies that are so interrelated to each other.. once one of them drowns.. it drags everyone with them.. and i'm not talking just Canada alone..
  • edited November 2008
    ^ Globalization at work.
  • edited November 2008
    *nods in agreement*
  • edited November 2008
    Harper is sweet.
    YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • edited November 2008
    Steven;41107 said:
    ^ Globalization at work.
    I can't wait till shit hits the fan. It's about time people get a slap in the face. The West never really cared when we control other people's market, but now assets are starting to be bought from overseas. This is going to get interesting.

    Also, fuck Harper. He tried to replace our financial system (which is actually easing the effects of the Wall Street meltdown) with the American ones.
  • edited November 2008
    BUT BUT BUT TAX CUTS FREELOADING WELFARE BUMS WASTE AND FRAUD WE'LL CUT BACK HONEST.

    And the dog whistle sounds, and a bunch of people will go vote for him and his MPs again because they actually believe that after 20 years of governments repeatedly cutting back on staff and spending, there's still any fraud and fat in the system to cut!

    ... or that there's any tax left to cut. News flash! Tax rates were as high as 80% in the top bracket in the 1950s and 1960s! Today the highest combined federal-provincial marginal tax rate is somewhere around 43 to 45%, and even that's gone down by ten percentage points compared to the early 1990s when it was more typically around 50 to 55%.

    Today the Canadian government takes in around $200 billion and spends that and a little bit less. If we had the same size of government as we did in the 1960s that figure would be more like $300 billion today. Not exactly world-shattering, but that extra $100 billion a year would let us retire the national debt in one term of government.

    Think about it.
  • edited November 2008
    Panic and fearmongering.

    I have to ask you people, what's wrong with a recession? Answer it for yourself, I already know my answer.
  • edited November 2008
    mrbubbles;41125 said:
    Panic and fearmongering.

    I have to ask you people, what's wrong with a recession? Answer it for yourself, I already know my answer.
    I went onto Wikipedia to check the definition of a recession, however I don't get a word of it. So what is a recession anyway? I know it is bad and that's about it.
  • edited November 2008
    Student0667;38106 said:
    Am I the only one here who is an ENTHUASTIC supporter of Prime Minister Harper and the Conservative Party? Even if you are not as enthusiastic as me, you should still go out and vote.
    lol.



    Harper now presides over the highest spending government in Canadian history, having increased federal government spending by 15 per cent.

    $19.2 BILLION in pre-election spending between June and September 2008.

    A $13-billion surplus blown in just 30 months and now on the brink of deficit.
  • edited November 2008
    Student0667;41128 said:
    So what is a recession anyway? I know it is bad and that's about it.
    Exactly, how can you know something is bad when you don't even know what it is? Don't worry though, you're not the only one, plenty of people are brainwashed in a similar fashion.

    The opposite of recession is economic growth, which obviously to many people, is good for one reason, rises in your standard of living.

    Take the main benefits of an economic growth and turn them upside down, you get recession. Little job creation, underconsumption, deflation, foreclosures.

    Note, in order for the last 4 things to happen, you need overproduction, overconsumption, inflation, and people buying houses they can't afford. These 4 things I mentioned are results of speculation, logically, you don't produce, buy products or houses unless you know you can pay for it (now or later, usually later), when you can't, well, shit hits the fan. Production and consumption drives economic growth, when it's sustainable, meaning you can afford to buy the stuff with the money you own.

    It's a popular panache these day to blame everything on Bush Jr, but this problem, yeah, you can definitely blame on it Bush Jr. Based on historical trends, a major recession was suppose to hit in 2001-2002, but Bush Jr. not wanting to suffer the fate of his father, had Fed Chair Alan Greenspan dumped the interest rate so low to prop up massive spending binge to prevent a recession, and you get economic growth.

    Bush Jr isn't stupid, he just doesn't give a fuck about anyone else but himself. The false economic growth under his first term was so that he can get reelected for a second term. When the big problem surface in 08/09, he doesn't give a shit, he's outta office.

    Under Bush's watch, USA had the biggest spending spree in history at both household and federal level in the negative range (spending more than you earn). I would say this wouldn't happen if Gore was elected, but hey, he was, the rich Bush backers aren't letting that happen, they don't want a environmental hippie in office.

    IMO.

    Several arguments to why a recession is a good thing:

    1. Realistic market values for everything you want to buy.

    2. Consumption level back down to earth.

    3. People saving money instead of spending endlessly, meaning: paying down your debt.

    These arguments can tell the exact motives of why a recession is supposedly bad. The realty, retail, manufacturing, auto, credit card, and the media (whose incomes are advertising dollars from these industries), they are the loser, and the average person, he/she will do fine, if he has a saving and realistic budgeted spending habits, if not, there's always the welfare check.
    i_like_hiking;41130 said:
    lol.



    Harper now presides over the highest spending government in Canadian history, having increased federal government spending by 15 per cent.

    $19.2 BILLION in pre-election spending between June and September 2008.

    A $13-billion surplus blown in just 30 months and now on the brink of deficit.
    Yeah, Harper is a real fiscal conservative alright, what happened to spend less and tax less ideal of the conservative huh?
  • edited November 2008
    mrbubbles;41125 said:
    Panic and fearmongering.

    I have to ask you people, what's wrong with a recession? Answer it for yourself, I already know my answer.
    It really depends on how you live your life. If you live way beyond your means (which is the majority of people), they're going to struggle to pay off their debts once they're laid off. Less income means less spending, and less profits for businesses, then there's a layoff, then less income and it leads to a cascade. As your bank account starts to shrink, people resorts to other means of feeding themselves that can lead to higher rates of crime.

    Also, even if you have been saving up and living within your means, you can see your wealth shrink as inflation starts to grow. Our economy is dependent on consumption of goods and services, so once people cut back on their spendings, our GDP will decline. As our GDP decline, the value of our dollar will as well. The government will then most likely starts to print more money to make up for the loss, which will further inflate the valule of our mint.

    Essentially, a recession means a decline in social welfare.

    I don't study economics, but these are the things that I've gathered from what I've read so far. Take it with a grain of salt if you will, but it's how I see things.

    EDIT: I just saw your post.
    1. Realistic market values for everything you want to buy.

    2. Consumption level back down to earth.

    3. People saving money instead of spending endlessly, meaning: paying down your debt.
    1. Not necessarily. As our GDP decline, so will the value of our mint. Meaning that we have to pay more to make up for the loss. It's starting to happen with groceries in the states.

    2. True.

    3. Hmm...this depends. As you mentioned, people overconsume, which means they're living beyond their means and become financially unstable. Chances are, these debts will never be paid off.
  • edited November 2008
    Agentbob;41136 said:
    It really depends on how you live your life. If you live way beyond your means (which is the majority of people), they're going to struggle to pay off their debts once they're laid off. Less income means less spending, and less profits for businesses, then there's a layoff, then less income and it leads to a cascade. As your bank account starts to shrink, people resorts to other means of feeding themselves that can lead to higher rates of crime.
    Blank statement. Historical figures and events show otherwise.

    What you are describing is an economy on a brink of depression. The cascading stop at some point, based on how the monetary and fiscal policy is run from the federal level.
    Agentbob;41136 said:

    Also, even if you have been saving up and living within your means, you can see your wealth shrink as inflation starts to grow. Our economy is dependent on consumption of goods and services, so once people cut back on their spendings, our GDP will decline. As our GDP decline, the value of our dollar will as well. The government will then most likely starts to print more money to make up for the loss, which will further inflate the valule of our mint.

    Essentially, a recession means a decline in social welfare.
    A recession is a deflation in price, not inflation. GDP =/= value of currency, it's not that simple. Both of which renders your point moot. If any leader has any sense of basic history, printing out more currency is stupidity.
    Agentbob;41136 said:

    1. Not necessarily. As our GDP decline, so will the value of our mint. Meaning that we have to pay more to make up for the loss. It's starting to happen with groceries in the states.

    3. Hmm...this depends. As you mentioned, people overconsume, which means they're living beyond their means and become financially unstable. Chances are, these debts will never be paid off.
    1. Prices go down in a recession, a recession is furthered when people keep waiting for the prices to go even further. When groceries increase in price, it's still inflation. It takes an inflation (and among other things)to led to a recession.

    3. Non-payable debt will be written off, overconsumers will not be able to borrow, they will learn to save.
  • edited November 2008
    Y'all tell me a recession isn't so bad when you get told by your boss that you just lost your job.

    Happened to a friend of mine just a few days back - bam, lost their job just like that, and it's close to Christmas, too. :omg:
  • edited November 2008
    B.C. has 'reduced expectations' in face of world economic slump: finance minister

    http://www.mytelus.com/ncp_news/arti...icleID=3043596
  • edited November 2008
    anyone know of a good foreclosure listing for BC?
  • edited November 2008
    Craigslist?
  • edited November 2008
    DaNoobie;41161 said:
    anyone know of a good foreclosure listing for BC?
    Don't expect too much of a drop. Only people bailing out are foreigners and people who have cash deposits on new condos.

    The lending practice of Canadian institution is regulated compared to the Americans. "Don't need to disclose my income and I'm approved for $700,000 no down mortgage, sweet." How could any sound person not see this coming?
  • edited November 2008
    I'm not looking to get laid JayDub

Leave a Comment