To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

A High GPA Is Not All What It Seems To Be

edited November 2007 in General
I know some people think that you are smart if you have a 3.7, 3.8 GPA, etc. But does your GPA tell you everything about that person? Does a high GPA mean that you are a smart person?

I have heard from a few professors that grades do not always reflect how smart a student is. So, in context, the professor was trying to say that someone who has a 3.5 GPA is not necessarily smarter than someone with a 2.5 GPA.

Think about it. After high school, everyone started fresh. Once the first days of classes started, it didn't matter if you had a 3.5 GPA or 3.7 GPA in high school.

After college it is about the same. My communications professor is on the review board for interviews. She said that a lot of times the people with the highest GPA's didn't get the jobs.

Think about it. Would you hrie someone with a high GPA who doesn't dress professionally or doesn't have good communication skills? You most likely wouldn't.

In conclusion, my point is that you shouldn't stress so much about your GPA. I am not saying to not try to get a high GPA, but you shouldn't worry about it. I bet you 10 years down the road you won't even remember your GPA.

Comments

  • edited November 2007
    The only reason employers put so much emphasis is it's the quickest way to narrow down an applicant pool in the hundreds down to just a few to interview. It's the closest objective standard there is to an indication of smartness, even though it's not always accurate. The good thing is it really only matters for your first job out of college; afterwards, it's all about experience.
  • edited November 2007
    GPA means nothing unless youre in grad school or an honors program or going for scholarships...you think some company is going to contact the school asking your GPA for a BA, or BS, I know about law school they pick the highest GPA people but thats grad school anyway...
  • edited November 2007
    GPA seems unfair to me.

    I find that science courses are generally pretty difficult...
    Personal experience: Calculus 1, Calculus 2, Discrete Math, etc.
    Friends' experiences: Chemistry, Physics, Engineering

    Whereas arts courses are relatively easy in my opinion.
    Personal experience: Phil 100, Crim 131
    Friends' experiences: English, History

    It's frustrating that I have to work my ass off just to get a B (or even just to pass) these tough math and science courses but I can take an arts course, play video games all class and still pull off an A.

    Yet, they're all lumped together into my GPA as if all the courses are the same.
  • edited November 2007
    i could care less abt my GPA.. if i could.. but unfortunately registering for classes require you to have decent GPA.. the higher the better.. some times you're just forced to work for it.. or keep it up.. =(
  • edited November 2007
    Im going to try and go for the open scholarship i need my gpa next term to be 3.5 then 3.7 the next, going to work my ass off, but even then in the arts department subjective things such as essays and papers can always get you...even though science and math are hard theres not much subjectivity? or as much anyway
  • edited November 2007
    Obviously being smart academically is not going to get you through everything in life, but having a high GPA could say a lot of things about your personality and work ethic... I know it doesn't determine everything about a person, but generally it takes hard work and persistence to keep those numbers up.
  • edited November 2007
    Spent so long on an essay worth a pitiful part of my mark, got it back and got a C when I was sure I'd get an A. Lost marks because the structure expected wasnt what I expected, and I normally get b+ or higher on essays. I applied myself yet my effort didnt reflect my mark.
  • edited November 2007
    Throughout my whole undergrad career, I never cared about my gpa...until I was almost done and I had to figure out what grad school to go to. If you are planning on working after your degree, it doesn't matter as much I think, because no employer really looks at your transcript or asks your gpa as long as you have the degree.
  • edited November 2007
    I hate GPAs. Mine is not anywhere near as good as it should be cuz I tackled 4 difficult courses in the same semester.

    Ugh.
  • edited November 2007
    I concur re: GPA etc.

    I heard a story about a top-notch student, great undergrad GPA, and they went into grad school straight off. Very rapidly, the shine went off the metal, because said individual fell apart when having to do research work. These things do happen - someone will not be suited for largely self-directed work, and not realize this because undergrads tend (even in fourth year) to be put into structured environments where there's a fairly good deal of handholding by the prof and TAs.
  • edited November 2007
    Nothings easy. Those who realize this will have a great gpa in undergrad, and then perform well at grad school too. It's a universal trait that is directly related to success..."pursuit of excellence"
  • edited November 2007
    GPA is not related to how smart or intelligent one is. Even making that statement is problematic for there are no universal definitions regarding the concept of intelligence. Intelligence is also a fluid concept especially among students.

    Perhaps GPA is more a measure of anxiety: one fears for the future because he may not find a job. As such, he studies to such an extent so as to increase his employability (because he knows employers will look at his grades).

    Perhaps GPA is a measure of conditions conducive to getting good marks: Student A does better than Student B because the former does not have to worry about bills to pay or working while Student B may be a single mother who is not only trying to get an education but has to work and raise her children.

    GPA can also be a measure of commitment, which as we know is not always correlated with intelligence. The one who is more committed will get better grades while the truly "intelligent" (I have problems using this term because I believe there is no set definition) rely on their brains and are hence more lazy and perhaps even procrastinators.

    I'm sure GPA can be correlated with many other things but it is at best marginally related to intelligence. There can even be a negative effect: those who study more and get higher grades sacrifice elements of their social life and will have problems socializing. As such, they will actually become less employable because they would perform worse in interviews as a result of their diminished sociability.

    Needless to say, however, all other things being equal, a higher GPA will likelier land you a job or increase your chances for acceptance at a graduate program.
  • edited November 2007
    I always get close to that open scholarship, but my GPA's been dropping. The main reason is that I took a new approach to University life, and that is:

    40% Work experience (relevant or not)
    30% Extracurricular activities (clubs, etc.)
    20% Networking
    10% Grades

    I can make more money than an open scholarship if I worked a second p/t job (which I do; I get good experience as well).
  • edited November 2007
    having to work and go to school i obviously cant dedicate the time and effort into school as i probably could
    and it sucks if employers do use gpas to filter, but thats just the reality of things, high gpa = higher probability ur a brighter person (not necessarily true, but its a filter as mentioned above)

Leave a Comment