To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Should prostitution be legalized?

edited November 2007 in General
Well, people have been complaining that this place is dead. So here's an interesting topic that I saw being debated (rather ineptly if you ask me) in the opinions section of The Peak.

My opinion: yes. A characteristically long-winded explanation of this opinion will follow after a few people have been able to get their ideas out. :)
«1

Comments

  • edited October 2007
    No.

    It is not a "real" job. It is disgusting. Prostitutes should be told to go get a real job or else be thrown in jail for life.

    Prostitution is not something that should be encouraged. What is the benefit of it??

    Gross!
  • edited October 2007
    Not to break my "wait before posting" rule, but you honestly think things should be illegal because you think they're gross? Many people think gay sex is gross, should that be illegal?
  • edited October 2007
    I think it should be legal. I mean, why not? They're providing a service, just like other trades-people. And if it were legalized, with specific guidelines, then maybe it might cut down on the spread of STI's and the violent exploitation of prostitutes by pimps. If they want to earn an honest living selling their bodies, why can't they? Maybe if they weren't always worried about being caught by the police, and then subsequently thrown in prison, they could earn some more money to get them out of their rut. I can guarantee most prostitutes aren't prostitutes by choice. They're doing what they need to do to earn a living. Who is anybody to tell them they can't? Sex isn't illegal. Sex between strangers isn't illegal. So why is it when money is exchanged, it's suddenly illegal?

    And hell, if they legalize it, the government can tax it, just as they would anybody else with a job. They would have to spend less money on police out to bust "Johns" and actually do something useful for a change.

    Whether you like it or not, making it illegal won't make the problem go away, so why not embrace it, in order to make the best of the situation?
  • edited October 2007
    yeah porn is sex for money, why isn't that illegal?
    What difference does it make, it is going to happen whether it is legal or not. Making it legal might actually save some of their lives from the sick freaks out there. But that costs money, and there are some more important things out there to spend it on.
  • edited October 2007
    Paying for a commodity is pretty much the foundation of economy isnt it?
    In this case, the commodity is their sexual organs

    Hell to make it more extreme, 95% of us sell our bodies out as commodity because we work for someone for a wage.

    A lot of it has to do with our Judeo-Christian society in my opinion.
  • edited October 2007
    I find it annoying and ironic that the anti-legalization people will often bring up the word "misogynist." Myself, I find it far more hateful towards women to ask the government to tell them who they may or may not have sex with, and for what reasons. Given the huge disparities between the quality of life for pro's in, say, Nevada and, say, Downtown Vancouver, I find it interesting that the people who actively campaign to keep these women in the hands of violent pimps and in constant threat of beatings, addiction and disease, call the other side misogynistic. You do not "encourage" something by allowing it. Regular old casual sex is legal, does the government encourage that? It's a little creepy to think that the government honestly believes they have the right to mandate the sexual conduct of consenting adults.

    I don't think it's all that compelling to say that it's going to happen anyway, so why not legalize it. I mean, murder is going to happen anyway. I think it should be legalized not because you can't stop it, but because it shouldn't be illegal. I don't recognize the government's ability to tell me or anyone else what is or is not moral. That's not their mandate. Think whatever you want about prostitution, but making it law is another matter.
  • edited October 2007
    I think it's important to ignore the stereotype of prostitutes standing on street corners waiting for someone to come pick them up. But a lot of prostitution these days happens legitimately behind the scenes. Look how many massage parlours are all over Vancouver, and you know what goes on there. A semi-legalized form of prostitution. Or how about when you're flipping through the Georgia Straight and you see pages and pages of ads for escort agencies...yup, pay for play by the hour. I don't think prostitution should be legalized, but anything that can be done to keep it off our streets should be done.

    Weed, on the other hand should be legalized :D
  • edited October 2007
    Morro;16572 said:
    I don't think it's all that compelling to say that it's going to happen anyway, so why not legalize it. I mean, murder is going to happen anyway. I think it should be legalized not because you can't stop it, but because it shouldn't be illegal.
    I don't think that's a fair argument at all. You need to distinguish between the selling of the service, and the service itself. Murder itself is a crime. Which is why, the selling of murder as a service (ie. hiring a hitman to kill your wife) is also illegal. Doing cocaine is illegal, therefore the selling of cocaine, or trafficking cocaine is illegal.

    Sex is not illegal. So why then does it become illegal when it's sold as a service? It doesn't make any sense.
  • edited October 2007
    You're right, sex isn't illegal. But the crimes (ie. abuse) associated with prostitution are. In that sense, legalizing prostitution would only expose the sex trade workers to more assaults.
  • edited October 2007
    To the authorities, prostitution is above anything a locational problem (I'll say why later). It is not illegal to sell your body for sex in Canada. There's the pornography industry of course but also various "massage parlours" (advertisements for which you can find in newspapers). Also, don't some women marry rich assholes for money? Isn't that also a form of prostitution? By definition either of these practices qualifies as prostitution because prostitution is "the act or practice of engaging in sexual intercourse for money".

    Before even engaging in a debate regarding the subject we must acknowledge that the laws regarding prostitution are selectively enforced (i.e. enforced unfairly). This is related to why it's a locational problem: the city's (or a particular neighbourhood's) image is tarnished when we see prostitutes advertising themselves during night. This is when it becomes problematic for the authorities so they arrest the prostitutes, a perishable solution considering many prostitutes are not prostitutes by choice. The law should apply to everyone equally, so why not enforce prostitution laws on pornographers and keepers of "massage parlours"? This would probably be impossible, so I believe it would make sense to legalize and regulate prostitution. Aside from being fair, there would be numerous other benefits:

    1. Less contraction of STDs. Parlours would be legalized and regulated meaning that all workers would have to be regularly checked (much like in the pornography industry). Pimps on the street don't care about how healthy their prostitutes are.

    2. More revenue. Prostitution could be taxed and this means more revenue. Law enforcement agencies wouldn't exert much energy enforcing the law because it would all be legal, in turn saving resources.

    3. Less abuse to women. Women wouldn't be abused by pimps and johns because they'd be working in highly regulated environments. There would also be less drug abuse because pimps would not be addicting prostitutes to drugs.

    4. Personal freedom. People can do as we please insofar as they do not harm others. As it was said before, why should something become illegal when it's sold as a service? It doesn't make any sense.

    Keeping the practice illegal will perpetuate the abuse, drug-taking behaviours, STDs, and unfairness. The only counter-arguments so far presented is that it's gross and shouldn't be encouraged because there'd be no benefit. Well I listed some above and I'm certain there are many that I missed.

    The practice should be legalized everywhere, end of story.
  • edited October 2007
    You're right, sex isn't illegal. But the crimes (ie. abuse) associated with prostitution are. In that sense, legalizing prostitution would only expose the sex trade workers to more assaults.
    How do you figure? When illegal, prostitutes can not go to the police about having been assaulted, making them helpless targets. They can't hire legitimate security, because security firms won't work for criminals. I drove through the red light district in Amsterdam - believe me. You wouldn't even think about assaulting a woman, there. Legalized prostitution can be subject to mandatory drug testing and screening for STD's.

    How is that more dangerous than ignoring their problems and indeed punishing them more? Even the less desperate ones - the ones who are not addicted or enslaved by a pimp - have absolutely no recourse if they are assaulted or raped.

    [edit] - Insatiable: Very well said. Though I might have ranked those four points a little differently. :p
  • edited October 2007
    Kevin M.;16577 said:
    You're right, sex isn't illegal. But the crimes (ie. abuse) associated with prostitution are. In that sense, legalizing prostitution would only expose the sex trade workers to more assaults.
    Statistically speaking, taxi drivers are the most assaulted and robbed profession. Legalizing taxi drivers would only expose...

    oops
  • edited October 2007
    Kevin M.;16573 said:
    I think it's important to ignore the stereotype of prostitutes standing on street corners waiting for someone to come pick them up. But a lot of prostitution these days happens legitimately behind the scenes. Look how many massage parlours are all over Vancouver, and you know what goes on there. A semi-legalized form of prostitution. Or how about when you're flipping through the Georgia Straight and you see pages and pages of ads for escort agencies...yup, pay for play by the hour. I don't think prostitution should be legalized, but anything that can be done to keep it off our streets should be done.
    Any massage parlour or escort agency can technically qualify as a brothel or bawdy house or house of ill-repute (or any other variant of whorehouse) and can hence come in conflict with the law. The reason it doesn't is because it in my opinion doesn't tarnish the image of our fair city. Another likely reason is because the things commonly associated with street prostitution (drugs, abuse, disease, etc.) are not associated with these permissible forms. Do you think the authorities would keep a blind eye to the escort agencies and parlours if they knew there was violence, abuse, and disease there? I don't think they'd be legal.

    Kevin M., you mentioned before that legalizing prostitution would increase assaults against them but I think this is a wrong way of looking at it. The relationship between fully legalizing prostitution and the factors it's associated with is a complicated one. All advocates of legalization obviously have some form of restraint or regulation in mind. That is, keeping prostitution in designated buildings and having workers and perhaps clientele examined for diseases (regulation). That's how it is in Nevada and Amsterdam. Hence, if anything, legalization (if done correctly) would lead to less abuse and disease--isn't that what we all want. Of course a significant amount of religious zealotry would have to be overcome to make this happen but I do see this as a possibility in Canada's future (considering how tolerant and open of a nation we are).

    Morro, thanks for agreeing with me. I'm certain that the arguments for legalization practically sell themselves. Also, the benefits from legalization come in no particular order and I'm sure there are more short- and long-term ones apart from what I mentioned.

    Overall, this is just one of those issues where prohibition does little but perpetuate the harmful concomitants of prostitution (I can think of abuse against women, drug abuse, and disease as immediate ones). Quite literally, I don't see any viable arguments against legalization (or maintaining the status quo) unless you think that sex is somehow evil or should not be encouraged. We must recognize that any arguments for legalization usually have some sort of regulation in mind so the legalization view should not be taken as outright legitimation of street prostitution. Many misunderstandings often arise here because the prohibitionists take a rather displaced view of the legalization and obviously disprove it. If you want to disprove legalization, you must first understand it properly and take a proper verison of it.

    Ultimately, for better or for worse, "the world's oldest profession" is here to stay. Such a constant (it exists in practically every society for practically as long as money has) cannot simply be uprooted with prohibition. We must change our outlook and how we conceive the problem if we are to make genuine progress.
  • edited October 2007
    Disgusting.

    Protitutes are for those losers that cant speak english or cant get a decent girlfriend.

    If you all think it should be leagalized, you're nuts. Its a disgusting "occupation"....its not even a real job. I dont care why they're on the streets, there is no lack of jobs in this city right now, same goes for all the other homeless losers on the street.

    Same goes for strippers. Pathetic jobs for girls who cant go out and find a real job. Sure, just sell your body, that works better. Its the easy way out, right? Some people need to have self respect. Horrid!

    Oh sure, go and legalize it. Cuz prostitution just looks so great on our city streets. Really. Looks great.
  • edited October 2007
    baby e;16588 said:
    Disgusting.

    Protitutes are for those losers that cant speak english or cant get a decent girlfriend.

    If you all think it should be leagalized, you're nuts. Its a disgusting "occupation"....its not even a real job. I dont care why they're on the streets, there is no lack of jobs in this city right now, same goes for all the other homeless losers on the street.

    Same goes for strippers. Pathetic jobs for girls who cant go out and find a real job. Sure, just sell your body, that works better. Its the easy way out, right? Some people need to have self respect. Horrid!

    Oh sure, go and legalize it. Cuz prostitution just looks so great on our city streets. Really. Looks great.
    You're not understanding. Whether you or I like prostitution has zero to do with whether or not it should be legal. And as for prostitution on the streets - that's exactly what legalization would stop. If they were able to set up legitimate places of business, they wouldn't need street corners.
  • edited October 2007
    I do understand. I dont think it should be legal because it is not something that should be encouraged.

    It is not a real job.

    No one benefits from it except the coke-head whores who are getting a little bit of money to buy more cocaine.

    It is not something that should be allowed or legalized or whatever. Its a matter of what is right and what is wrong. Do you honestly think that prostitution is right? I honestly do not see how. ITS NOT A JOB! Its a disgusting thing that is on our streets and shouldnt even be there in the first place.

    We should be helping those women by making places where people can help them find proper jobs, not setting up " legitimate places of business" so that they can whore their bodies out. Now THAT would be good. That is what the government should put some money towards.

    Oh no, wait, I forgot, lets all donate money to save the trees in Stanley Park, cuz, after all, thats more important....right?

    :/
  • edited October 2007
    Do you honestly think that prostitution is right?
    See, you say you understand, but there you go again. Let me rephrase: Neither you nor the government nor anybody else has the right to mandate the sexual conduct of consenting adults. Again: DOES NOT MATTER what you think of prostitution. It's not an issue. It has zero, zip, NOTHING to say about the issue of legalization.

    And, as I already said, legalizing something is not encouraging it. Cigarettes are legal - does the government encourage that? Casual sex without the exchange of money is legal - does the government encourage that? Of course not.

    Prostitution could be the most disgusting thing imaginable - doesn't matter. Not the issue.
  • edited October 2007
    baby e, just cause you cant get into porn, stripping or prostitution doesn't mean you should spewing your jealousy filled messages to us.
  • edited October 2007
    baby e;16591 said:
    I do understand. I dont think it should be legal because it is not something that should be encouraged.
    It's not a good idea to equate the legal with the morally right. Many things that are legal are not morally right. Yet usually, everything that is not morally right is illegal.
    baby e;16591 said:
    It is not a real job.

    No one benefits from it except the coke-head whores who are getting a little bit of money to buy more cocaine.
    The reality of the situation is a bit more dismal. Usually prostitutes have a pimp who gets them addicted to all sorts of drugs. This wouldn't happen if the practice were made legal. I don't think anyone benefits from its illegality.
    baby e;16591 said:
    It is not something that should be allowed or legalized or whatever. Its a matter of what is right and what is wrong. Do you honestly think that prostitution is right? I honestly do not see how. ITS NOT A JOB! Its a disgusting thing that is on our streets and shouldnt even be there in the first place.
    Trudeau phrased it best when he proclaimed that "there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation". It may be a matter of right and wrong but not all of us share your conception of what "right" is. You can't just assume that your conception of right is universal.
    baby e;16591 said:
    We should be helping those women by making places where people can help them find proper jobs, not setting up " legitimate places of business" so that they can whore their bodies out. Now THAT would be good. That is what the government should put some money towards.
    I understand your concern but we probably wouldn't have drug-addicted and disease-ridden prostitutes if the practice were legalized. Hence, fewer problems and more revenue for the government. Therefore, we all win.
  • edited October 2007
    Morro;16593 said:

    And, as I already said, legalizing something is not encouraging it. Cigarettes are legal - does the government encourage that?
    I'm sure the government does because after all, look at the amount of revenue it receives each year from cigarettes.

    I have my opinions. You asked if I thought it should be legalized. No i do not think it should. It is not just sex between two consenting adults. The women are forced to do it (because of their income situation, etc). Do you really think they WANT to be prostitutes? Well if they do, then fine, go for it. I dont think they really do tho.
  • edited October 2007
    baby e;16591 said:
    I do understand. I dont think it should be legal because it is not something that should be encouraged.

    It is not a real job.

    No one benefits from it except the coke-head whores who are getting a little bit of money to buy more cocaine.

    It is not something that should be allowed or legalized or whatever. Its a matter of what is right and what is wrong. Do you honestly think that prostitution is right? I honestly do not see how. ITS NOT A JOB! Its a disgusting thing that is on our streets and shouldnt even be there in the first place.

    We should be helping those women by making places where people can help them find proper jobs, not setting up " legitimate places of business" so that they can whore their bodies out. Now THAT would be good. That is what the government should put some money towards.

    Oh no, wait, I forgot, lets all donate money to save the trees in Stanley Park, cuz, after all, thats more important....right?

    :/
    I think you're referring more to a stereotype of prostitutes, as the cocaine-addicted, anorexic, nymphomaniac who just loves the lifestyle of being a prostitute. But there's a story behind everything. That's all some of these girls know. Yeah, they could go to a shelter, or to go one of those designated centres that'll help them find a job, but some of them don't have the luxury of free time to wait around for that to happen. They don't HAND out jobs at these places. Sometimes, you need money now, for whatever reason, be it food, drugs, whatever. Yes, drugs. But don't speak like prostitutes are the only people using their money towards drugs. A lot of people indulge in illegal substances, so you can't single them out.

    Now, as for prostitution being a legitimate profession, I would think that if they legalized it, it would be just as legitimate as anything else, like being a servant, or plumbing. They all provide a service. You're selling your own labour and your body to complete a service for a person. A butler/maid also sell their bodies to do work, is that not a real job? As for disgusting? Plumbers are arm-deep in shit some days (some would say that's true for prostitutes too, ZING), that sounds a lot more disgusting than having sex for a living. As for being for loser guys who can't get girlfriends....well, plumbers are for losers who can't fix their own fucking toilet. And some would argue fixing a toilet is much easier than obtaining a girlfriend.

    You can't ostracize an entire group of people just because of the profession they choose. They need to earn money, so why not let them? In the current state, as mentioned before already, legalizing and regulating it would just help to create a much safer environment for them. Hell, I think being a missionary is a pretty stupid profession, but I don't think taking that right away from them to become a missionary is a proper thing to do.
  • edited October 2007
    IMTEHKING;16594 said:
    baby e, just cause you cant get into porn, stripping or prostitution doesn't mean you should spewing your jealousy filled messages to us.
    LOL, maybe learn to spell your username right before you attack me :)

    Let me get this straight tho....im jealous of girls who whore themselves out to get money from random men who ejaculate in them (porn and prostitutes) or drool and degrade them while they strip in strip-clubs? Yah....that makes sense.

    Im quite attractive thanks, so if i wanted to do that shit, i prolly could (not that you really have to be attractive to do any of that stuff). However, i CHOOSE not to....cuz i have self-respect for myself and my body :)

    Nice try tho.
  • edited October 2007
    Magnificent_Bastard;16598 said:
    Now, as for prostitution being a legitimate profession, I would think that if they legalized it, it would be just as legitimate as anything else, like being a servant, or plumbing. They all provide a service.
    A service? Sex is a service? You want sex, then GET A FUCKING GIRLFRIEND LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO.
    Magnificent_Bastard;16598 said:
    As for disgusting? Plumbers are arm-deep in shit some days (some would say that's true for prostitutes too, ZING), that sounds a lot more disgusting than having sex for a living.
    Are you being serious? Random guys are ejaculating inside of you....on a daily basis. What the fuck? Thats not normal. I honestly dont know what kind of sex lives you people on here have, but for me, i have sex with one person....my boyfriend. No other random creepy guys. That is so disgusting its not even funny.
    Magnificent_Bastard;16598 said:
    As for being for loser guys who can't get girlfriends....well, plumbers are for losers who can't fix their own fucking toilet. And some would argue fixing a toilet is much easier than obtaining a girlfriend.
    Hmmm, lets see, a guy cant fix his toilet seat....go out and buy a new one, thats ok with me. A guy cant find a gf so he goes downtown to sleep with a whore who is prolly disease-ridden and high on coke....and thats ok to you guys? No, it isnt.

    I was at a restaurant downtown once and walked in a hooker in the washroom who left the door unlocked. She was all like, "oh, i never lock doors, but hey, come here and look at this rash here and tell me what you think it is" as she's flashing me her vagina. I was so disgusted that i ran out of there back to my date who was sitting at the table. She walked by us, outside, and a cab rolled up and she got in and they drove off. That is not right guys, im sorry i dont care even if you say it is.

    And im guessing you guys dont understand this because you dont have a vagina. Id like to hear some responses from other girls on here.

    Being a prostitute is QUITE different than being a prostitute. VERY different "professions".
  • edited October 2007
    baby e;16600 said:
    A service? Sex is a service? You want sex, then GET A FUCKING GIRLFRIEND LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO.
    You're not getting the point. Okay, the fact of the matter is, yes, there are huge-ass losers out there who can't get a girlfriend no matter what. Prostitutes cater to that demand. You know...supply and demand, basic business. Just like maids cater to people who don't want to clean their own shit, it's no different. Sex can be a service, just like house-keeping. Just because it's sex is completely irrelevant. Not all people hold sex with such high regard as yourself.
    baby e;16600 said:
    Are you being serious? Random guys are ejaculating inside of you....on a daily basis. What the fuck? Thats not normal. I honestly dont know what kind of sex lives you people on here have, but for me, i have sex with one person....my boyfriend. No other random creepy guys. That is so disgusting its not even funny.
    So you're telling me, that a guy who only dates a girl just so he can fuck her is better off doing that, than calling up a prostitute? I mean, in the end, isn't this the exact same scenario? The guy incurs some monetary loss, and gains sexual intercourse as a result. How is it different? Hell, with the prostitute, once it's done and finished with, there's no emotional residue or any kind of damaging, since the prostitute knows she's a prostitute, it's what she chose to do. With a dating relationship just for the purpose of sex, the girl might end up with emotional damages from finding out that she was used just like a prostitute. Fuck, I know a ton of girls who may as well be prostitutes, because they only date guys with money. Where's the line? Shouldn't they be thrown in jail?
    baby e;16600 said:
    Hmmm, lets see, a guy cant fix his toilet seat....go out and buy a new one, thats ok with me. A guy cant find a gf so he goes downtown to sleep with a whore who is prolly disease-ridden and high on coke....and thats ok to you guys? No, it isnt.
    My point is that if a guy can't do something "simple" like fix a toilet seat or clear a clog, how is he less of a loser than a guy who can't get a girlfriend? Hell, even ask some of the guys here, they'll tell you getting a girlfriend, and then subsequently getting her to take your penis isn't the easiest task in the world.

    Besides, you keep dancing around the issue of being "disease ridden". It's been mentioned several times that with proper regulation and supervision, prostitution could be made safe by enforcing the practice of safe sex. And no, not ALL prostitutes are coke-fiends, that's just a stereotype.
  • edited October 2007
    I was at a restaurant downtown once and walked in a hooker in the washroom ...
    You're describing the filthy conditions that are associated with prostitution.

    The argument is that if prostitution were legal:
    1. It would not be in public any more.
    2. There would be rules and restrictions.
  • edited October 2007
    Magnificent_Bastard;16601 said:
    Not all people hold sex with such high regard as yourself.
    Then maybe thats the problem with our society.

    Magnificent_Bastard;16601 said:
    So you're telling me, that a guy who only dates a girl just so he can fuck her is better off doing that, than calling up a prostitute?
    Again, I dont know what kind of relationships you have. Any girl who dates a guy just because he wants to have sex with her is a complete idiot. Glad im not in that situation.
    Magnificent_Bastard;16601 said:
    My point is that if a guy can't do something "simple" like fix a toilet seat or clear a clog, how is he less of a loser than a guy who can't get a girlfriend?
    Its not the same thing. Sorry, its not. Cant fix a clog, call a plumber. Cant get a girlfriend? Go get a hooker?? Doesnt seem right to me. Guys should just jerk off instead if they're THAT desperate.

    I really cant be bothered to keep fighting about this. I know im right. Prostitution should not be legalized so that those whores can have "safe" places to do it and that pathetic guys can keep fucking them. And it DOES spread diseases by having them there doing that.

    Its the truth. If it were up to me, they'd all be thrown in jail or shot. Same goes for the pathetic losers who go to them to have sex. The end.

    :)
  • edited October 2007
    baby e;16606 said:
    Then maybe thats the problem with our society.

    Again, I dont know what kind of relationships you have. Any girl who dates a guy just because he wants to have sex with her is a complete idiot. Glad im not in that situation.

    Its not the same thing. Sorry, its not. Cant fix a clog, call a plumber. Cant get a girlfriend? Go get a hooker?? Doesnt seem right to me. Guys should just jerk off instead if they're THAT desperate.

    I really cant be bothered to keep fighting about this. I know im right. Prostitution should not be legalized so that those whores can have "safe" places to do it and that pathetic guys can keep fucking them. And it DOES spread diseases by having them there doing that.

    Its the truth. If it were up to me, they'd all be thrown in jail or shot. Same goes for the pathetic losers who go to them to have sex. The end.

    :)
    lol, that's great, you "know you're right". Quite a bold statement from a close-minded conservative who can't imagine life outside of their own little box. I think you need to understand that there's a whole other real world outside of your comfortable middle-class suburban life.

    Hell, you admitted to having premarital sex. Religious fundamentalists, (who would probably agree with your view of prostitution, by the way) would probably refer to you as a whore as well, for not adhering to rules of pre-marital celebacy. You'd probably think they're retarded. And rightly so, because that's only their opinion, and their moral beliefs. It doesn't apply to all of society.

    Besides, you're missing the point completely. The issue at hand isn't whether or not prostitution is morally right or wrong. That's completely irrelevant. It's not a moral issue, it's a social issue. Regardless of the "rightness" or "wrongness" of it, it's a problem that will continue to persist. The real issue is whether or not legalizing it and regulating it would benefit society (or at least those involved with the sex trade) when comparing it to its current state. And with this in mind, I haven't heard any reasonable argument against it.
  • edited October 2007
    yeah just so you all know plenty of married men who can have sex with their wives go for prostitutes, lol.
  • edited October 2007
    What about the reasons someone decides to prostitute herself? I am certain that most prostitutes believe that they have no other options.. its about survival. In their mind, they are not living in a world where they have choices. Perhaps they grew up in an abusive home, forcing her to move out and live homeless on the streets. How can you trust anybody, if the people that are suppose to love and support you unconditionally don’t (i.e. mom and dad). Perhaps, she has no friends and anyone that she had let in her life, burnt her really badly. How can you get a decent job with no fixed address, no clothes, can’t even bathe, no education, don’t know how to write a resume, etc. Maybe she knows there are community services out there that help, but she doesn’t trust no one. Everyone in her entire life has treated her so badly, so why would she trust them, why would she trust anyone? This is just an example…. I’m sure it gets a lot more complex.

    Anyways, I believe prostitution should be legalized. Not because I support it, but because I believe it’s the most humane thing to do. There will always be prostitution, whether you like it or not. To believe that there will be a time where no one will sell their body is idealistic. Sex sells.. that’s the way it will always be. Legalization makes the problem worse. It perpetuates abuse again women, spread diseases, addictions, etc. How does it do that? It creates a community where prostitutes feel powerless and are taken advantage of. The government and police force who are suppose to protect its people, including its most vulnerable citizens, turn their backs on them or punish them. She gets abused by her pimp/client, where does she go for help without being judge or thrown in jail. She becomes sick because she has contracted a disease. She can’t afford the medication to help her get better- she using her money for bare essential such as food, shelter, etc. Even if she could get the medication, she fears being judged and humiliated because of her lifestyle. She wants to go back to school- but the pimp takes most of her money, leaving her with barely anything… so the cycle continues.

    If it were legalized, women that are being abuse would be able to come forward without the fear being thrown in jail. Clients that abuse the prostitutes will be punished. If women are provided with disease testing every 3 months, they become healthier. Any money made will not be taken by pimps, and she may be able to save $$ towards school, for better a life. For some, a sense of trust will be established with people (whether its cops, health workers, community service workers, etc) and hopefully this will motivate her to seek help out of her situation, because she realizes that someone cares, she can do better and she has people supporting her. Government tax could be used towards services that help people in this situation – housing, treatment centres, employment resources, etc. Wouldn’t you want to create the best possible environment for a person to seek help, to heal, to grow, to become a better person? Legalization does this, making it illegal does not.
  • edited October 2007
    in my point of view, it should be legalized.

    Even when it's not legalized prostitution occurs. Stop lying to yourself

    However if there's a legalized system,

    say, prostitutes should renew their license every half a year, do their body check and get their license renewed only if they are HIV negative.

    would any guys wanted to consume "non-licensed" prostitute anymore?
    as least they are "uninfected" knowing that it won't stop them doing it when it's not legalized.

    say, they worked in a registered area with security personel around that building.

    Legalizing prostitution could help the society in some way, in my opinion

Leave a Comment