To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Who's taken cmpt150/macm101?

edited November 2012 in General
Profs are Kay Wiese for macm, Diana Cuckierman for cmpt for next semester.

Have 0 previous programming knowledge.

Comments

  • edited November 2012

  • macm 101 has no programming at all. Many regard it as a difficult course though. I took it with wiese, he was pretty good.

    cmpt 150 as I remember it only had a small assembly programming section. The rest of it is mostly circuit diagrams. So having no programming experience shouldn't be a huge hindrance. I haven't taken it with that prof though so I suppose it could be a little different. I found this course to actually be more interesting than I had expected. It is also kind of in the middle in terms of difficulty, not easy, but not really hard either.
  • Not sure if I should take macm with Kay Wiese or Brad Bart. 
  • same. i think ill take it with bart 
  • it will be harder with bart.
  • arghh not sure if its worth the extra commute for kay. who was your cmpt prof, ryan?
  • For 150 I had Harinder Khangura. If you are taking all of your other courses out in burnaby you are probably better off just staying there. I wouldn't say wiese's class is so easy it is worth going far out of your way for.
  • I could switch up my courses to take them all in surrey. Only problem I have with Bart is that he's a notorious hard marker/teacher, so I wouldn't want to take them unless there's a curve to make the average a C+ ish. I hear kay wiese is also not scaled and quite a bit of people will fail even with kay wiese?
  • Well it is a difficult course. People are bound to fail regardless who they take it with. Also, like all cmpt and macm courses, macm 101 is not marked on a curve. Occasionally profs will scale the grade ranges a little bit, but I wouldn't expect them to move much more than about 5%.

    I see in the outlines it mentions both offerings having two midterms. When I took it with Wiese (a few years ago mind you) there was only one midterm. It was worth 40% though. Wiese also let us have a cheat sheet for the exams, not sure if bart allows that or not.
  • ^ I got an a- in 150 with 63% lol.

    That was 4-5 years ago and with a not very good sessional instructor though
  • Well you got an A- didn't you? can't complain there
  • I am wondering is CMPT 150 doable for someone that has no electronic/computer experience?
  • Yeah it would be. There were one or two kids in my 150 class taking it as an elective. It is rare though. Im not really sure why someone not in computing would take it, unless they were really interested in logic circuits.

    You don't actually build any physical circuits. You learn how to draw them first and then are introduced to software that can simulate them. And remember these are logic circuits. So its AND and OR gates and stuff, not resistors, batteries, and switches. 
  • thanks ryan you've been very helpful. My only fear in macm101 which I need to transfer into computer science with, is that I'll fail as I know some people who have failed in Kay Wiese's class before. Do you recall what the average was for that class?
  • The average on out midterm was 79%. I'm not sure what the average on the final was, those grades weren't released. It was harder than the midterm, but I imagine the average still fell within the 60's
  • Big bump, but were you allowed to put examples on the cheat sheet?
  • I put examples on my cheet sheet
  • yeah I remember being able to too.
  • i took macm101, got A+, bout 2 yrs ago.
    but class average was very very low
    my major is mathematics and was easy for me,
    but for most of my friends who were from Arts, fount it quite challenging
    If you are familiar with math, should be easy, if not will be difficult.

Leave a Comment