To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

i believe in miracles..

edited June 2009 in General
Days from needing a transplant, miracle Quebec baby's heart cures itself

By Sidhartha Banerjee, The Canadian Press
ADVERTISEMENT

MONTREAL - By all accounts, Panagiotis Baltzis's five-month-old heart was broken beyond repair.

But then something shocking happened - while attached to a mechanical heart and with a transplant seemingly inevitable, the little scrapper's own ticker began to pick up the slack and started working properly again.

Doctors say young Panagiotis, just a few weeks shy of his first birthday, is one of the very few in the world to have made a full recovery after being hooked up to a Berlin Heart and not having a transplant.

The army of Montreal doctors and nurses who helped the tot along the way gathered to recount the tale with Panagiotis's parents on Friday.

They are all calling his recovery nothing short of a medical miracle.

Dr. Charles Rohlicek, a cardiologist at the Montreal Children's Hospital who was on call the night that Panagiotis was brought in, said the pint-sized infant with a shock of brown hair paid him a visit last week.

"He came to my clinic and he was saying, 'mama'," Rohlicek said.

"This for a baby who, on the first night I saw him, I thought he might die."

The infant's condition deteriorated quickly after being admitted to hospital last Dec. 18 after his pediatrician had concerns the youngster wasn't growing or putting on enough weight.

To his parent's shock, doctors who first examined Panagiotis told them he was suffering from acute congestive heart failure and that his life was hanging by a thread.

Medications failed to stop an abnormal, rapid heart beat that was making the youngster very sick.

Within two weeks of being admitted, his heart condition worsened and the parents were given "five minutes" to decide whether to put their son on a heart-lung machine which could potentially mean that Panagiotis would need a transplant.

His parents said they weren't ready to see their son hooked up to the machine and if he'd had more time to research it, Athanasios Baltzis said he might have said no.

"I remember walking in when they put him on the machine and falling on my knees," recounted Baltzis as he choked back tears.

"The first thing that went through my mind is, 'What have I done to this little baby?'

"It took my wife about four days to walk in because I wouldn't let her. It was just visually hard to see."

After seven days on the heart-lung machine, doctors made the decision to put Panagiotis on the Berlin Heart, a ventricular pump generally used as a bridge to a transplant.

The youngster survived the surgery but there was no heart available for transplant.

After a dozen days on the artificial heart, something astounding happened. Panagiotis's own heart began to beat again - and normally.

"The intention was to bridge this child for a heart transplant but now we were facing a situation where the left ventricle appeared normal," said Dr. Renzo Cecere, a cardiac surgeon.

"We had the option of (removing) the Berlin Heart and letting the child live on his own heart."

But Cecere said there was no way of knowing how the tot would react and re-installing the Berlin Heart or the heart-lung machine would be very difficult.

The installation of the mechanical heart also causes significant damage and is often regarded as a one-way ticket to a transplant.

But on Jan. 24, the Berlin Heart was removed, just 37 days after the baby had arrived in hospital.

And on Feb. 19, Panagiotis went home to celebrate Christmas in front of a dried-up Christmas tree.

"He wasn't supposed to get off the Berlin Heart - there are very few reported cases in this age group - we're talking a smattering, less than 10," said Rohlicek.

"He's behaving like a normal one-year-old guy. It's beyond me, but here he is. "

Panagiotis remains on medication to control his heart rhythm and some subsequent surgeries will be necessary, but for the most part he is doing well.

The playful youngster earned a number of nicknames during his time in hospital where some staff took to calling him "The Rock" because of his resiliency.

He will celebrate his first birthday at the end of the month and his mother Nadia Valerio said it would have a Superman theme - and justifiably so.

Meanwhile doctors say they'll keep a close watch on Panagiotis.

"I have a tremendous responsibility because everyone at the hospital knows this guy and I have to keep him well until he is at least 18 years of age," joked Rohlicek.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090612/health/health_infant_heart_miracle

i don't know how many of you followed this story.. but i was devastated when i found out they were unable to find a heart for transplant.. i hope this isn't some kind of cruel twist of fate and let this miracle not be a short lived one..

Comments

  • edited June 2009
    And so the birth of Clark Kent.
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2009
    its this kind of thing that reinforces my belief in God

    flame on
  • edited June 2009
    So god decided to mess with people, give this baby a bad heart, and then at the last minute, kind of go.. "ooh,...oh,........hahaha, nah, just kidding, the baby's fine". I guess I can appreciate a fun-loving deity with an odd sense of humour.

    Or was god using the baby as a guinea pig to prove a point; kind of like, I'm gonna fuck this baby up, then make him all better again, so that people will believe that I exist.
  • edited June 2009
    a real miracle would be the ft-hs being released in the next 2 months :D
  • edited June 2009
    aw....

    This reminds me of House.

    I miss House!
  • edited June 2009
    siuying;56109 said:
    i hope this isn't some kind of cruel twist of fate and let this miracle not be a short lived one..
    That's very often the case so I wouldn't hold your breath.
    IVT;56115 said:
    its this kind of thing that reinforces my belief in God

    flame on
    Okay, will do. First of all, god apparently thinks that this particular baby was more important than all of the other babies who simply die. But not important enough to be born without a heart problem in the first place.

    Not to mention that the big boss plays favorites in terms of illness also. Heart condition? Sure, he'll heal that (exactly as often as would be expected scientifically but whatever). Head injuries? Fine. Cancer? No problem. Amputated limb? Sorry, you're fucked.

    We're not talking entire arms and legs here, a finger–– hell even a fingertip would do. But no. God's unequivocal position is "fuck the amputees, I have a statistically insignificant number of people with curable conditions to miraculously heal."

    And I know, the heart condition was supposed to be incurable. But it's possible that it was either misdiagnosed in the first place, or hasn't actually been healed. Both are common occurrences. If the kid pulls through, god gets all the credit. If not, the doctors get blamed and/or the event gets ignored altogether. After all, patients die all the time. Dog bites man.

    If your god exists IVT, he might as well not. The world would operate exactly the same way.
  • edited June 2009
    FerrousWheel;56636 said:
    That's very often the case so I wouldn't hold your breath.
    i'm not.. just that it'll probably kill another small part of my humanity.. which is fine.. but i would've preferred it not to expend a baby's life to illustrate a point..
  • edited June 2009
    What? I have literally no idea what you're trying to say. The kid isn't dying or not dying purely for your education. The whole problem with this stupid stories is that they encourage people to focus on a single irrelevant case to inform their worldview rather than actually pay attention to what's going on in the world.
  • edited June 2009
    what? when did my post about the life of a baby get turned into paying attention to what's going on in the world? :confused: there isn't a problem to begin with.. the post IS intended for a single case...

    now for clarifications.. you quoted me and told me not to hold my breath on it.. which is fair.. i'm just saying that if he dies then i lose a part of my humanity..

    we all develop attachments to different things.. you may have it for the world.. i have it for new life..=P
  • edited June 2009
    ... and people tend to develop attachments to cute things.

    Would this be in the headlines if it happened to some old guy with a bad heart? Not a chance. Sure, this has value as a medical news story, but the "awwww its a baby" factor is why it's headline news..

    I liken it to the situation with baby-seal-hunt protests (not that I have a problem with the seal hunt). Tons of different animals are hunted every day, but people only care about the cute little baby seals.

    The old people and ugly animals of the world are always forgotten.
  • edited June 2009
    you should have titled this post "i believe in secular miracles.." :P
  • edited June 2009
    Ether;56689 said:
    ... and people tend to develop attachments to cute things.

    Would this be in the headlines if it happened to some old guy with a bad heart? Not a chance. Sure, this has value as a medical news story, but the "awwww its a baby" factor is why it's headline news..

    I liken it to the situation with baby-seal-hunt protests (not that I have a problem with the seal hunt). Tons of different animals are hunted every day, but people only care about the cute little baby seals.

    The old people and ugly animals of the world are always forgotten.
    that may be the case.. but then again there's just too much stuff that goes on around the world which begs the question.. how much can you care? how much can you do when people (the old and young) and animals (the cute and ugly) die everyday.. and wars break out on a daily basis..

    i just find that the news these days put too much emphasis on global issues as opposed to things that are more.. in sync with reality (if that makes sense).. the "global" element puts things in a perspective that's desensitizing.. so we know that this war killed X number of people.. or that the economic recession caused Y number of people to be out of work.. but what of it? the mere number is vague itself and lumping cases together to report them in an aggregated form deindividualizes the news.. and it makes it hard for people to appreciate and relate to (which is probably why we don't get the sympathetic factor) there's no one to direct the sympathy or attention to..

    individualized cases like this get overlooked or set aside for the greater and more "media worthy" news.. so yeah.. i suspect the baby thing had something to do with that "media worthy" frenzy.. but you could also consider that fact that it was able beat out all other similar news and managed to get some national coverage.. a means to an end maybe? =)

    i think everyone is aware that people and animals die as we speak.. it's an unspoken truth.. it's putting a name or focusing on one particular case that makes the difference.. makes it more concrete in reality..

    @randomuser: hahaha.. thanks for the suggestion.. =D i'll keep that in mind for my next similar post.. :tongue:

Leave a Comment