To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Revisiting WQB in the E-mail survey

edited October 2008 in General
Did anyone else fill that Survey out you got in your sfu webmail?

For the second year in a row I told them exactly what I thought of it, and how it made me end up with 66 lower division credits, and how it also limited my upper division selection.

Did anyone else bother to complete it or let them know?

Comments

  • edited October 2008
    I did the survey as well just because it is fun to piss on SFU. Regarding the WQB problem, I gave the WQB the lowest rating possible and I told them outright that taking two W and two Q courses is not going to make me a better writer and thinker.
  • edited October 2008
    the hell is wqb
  • edited October 2008
    Triple;38211 said:
    the hell is wqb
    Weren't you admitted before Fall 2006? You don't need to deal with this shi*.
  • edited October 2008
    I disagree with you in a way.

    I think high school does not prepare you to be a good writer, but thats what I think ENGLISH classes are for. Doesn't almost every degree force you to take two first year english classes anyway...?

    Any W designed course didn't help me write, my first year english classes are what helped me.
  • edited October 2008
    randomuser;38214 said:
    I disagree with you in a way.

    I think high school does not prepare you to be a good writer, but thats what I think ENGLISH classes are for.
    To tell you the truth, I don't really know what high school prepared me for. I pretty much re-learned everything after I got into university. However, I attribute trial and error as my prepartion to be a good writer.
    Doesn't almost every degree force you to take two first year english classes anyway...?
    Not History and Humanities.
    Any W designed course didn't help me write, my first year english classes are what helped me.
    Look, the thing is that expectations and criterias is so different amongst programs and professor that there is not really a standardized Writing method in university. One thing that a professor demands maybe blasphemy and madness to another professor.
  • edited October 2008
    I only did one lower division writing course and that was PHIL100.
  • edited October 2008
    Every degree forces you to take 2 lower division writing courses?

    Mines only required one and I had a choice between ENG, PHIL, HIST and a few other obscure courses. Upper division writing is some course that's part of the department you're in.
  • edited October 2008
    Myname;38230 said:
    Every degree forces you to take 2 lower division writing courses?
    No. All you are required to do is to take one lower level writing course and one upper level writing course.
  • edited October 2008
    For some reason I thought my degree required me to take at least one english class.

    But maybe I'm mixing that up with my transfer requirements, in which case they hold me to higher standards than people entering SFU from high school.
  • edited October 2008
    Every degree has different lower division requirements depending on what program you are in. Check out a program planner if you want to know what yours are.
  • edited October 2008
    I didn't find WQB all that helpful either
  • edited October 2008
    primexx;38283 said:
    I didn't find WQB all that helpful either
    Primexx, if you plan to run for Senate again, please put this quote on all your campaign posters. You will SO get elected!
  • edited October 2008
    To be honest, the wqb requirements really don't bother me. I would have taken some arts courses as gpa boosters anyways.

Leave a Comment