To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Height Preferences

135

Comments

  • edited September 2008
    how is no fatties and no uglies not shallow?

    height is a great standard to judge people by, if the height is incompatible the sex can be awkward
  • edited September 2008
    randomuser;38069 said:
    how is no fatties and no uglies not shallow?

    height is a great standard to judge people by, if the height is incompatible the sex can be awkward
    lol
  • edited September 2008
    go let some guy whos shorter than you try to stick it in you and see how you maneuver through that

    generally, in experience, if the person is at least as tall or taller than you it should work fine
  • edited October 2008
    randomuser;38069 said:
    if the height is incompatible the sex can be awkward
    Yea. Have you seen midget porn? They can work it with regular size people, you can too.
  • edited October 2008
    No i have not seen midget porn, and if you don't get my point maybe you should explore height differences and see for yourself what I mean
  • edited October 2008
    well i can see how short guys can be of use.. when you need a sexual outlet and don't want to see the face..
  • edited October 2008
    doggy style
    problem solved
  • edited October 2008
    Triple;38114 said:
    doggy style
    problem solved
    think about it...5'10 - 6' woman and a guy whos 5'4

    if legs give taller people most of their height, is he even going to be able to effectively mount her?
  • edited October 2008
    she can stand up
    bend over
    he gets a stool
    wham bam
  • edited October 2008
    ^but he's not going to get enough leverage from the stool.. plus it'll be a real bummer if he falls off the stool during the ah um... more heated moments..
  • edited October 2008
    randomuser;38126 said:
    think about it...5'10 - 6' woman and a guy whos 5'4

    if legs give taller people most of their height, is he even going to be able to effectively mount her?
    I'm confused, do you people all do it standing up?
  • edited October 2008
    if someone is on their hands and knees they are x amount of distance from the ground / bed

    the other person is going to also be x amount of distance from the ground bed, based on height

    thus, the surfaces in question are not going to be level all the time

    even if the girl was on her back...(do i really need to go on?)
  • edited October 2008
    DaNoobie;38139 said:
    I'm confused, do you people all do it standing up?
    how else do you do the doggie style? care to submit a proposition on how it can be done otherwise? (cosmo would probably love to get its hands on that...:shade: )
  • edited October 2008
    dogs do it standing on their hind legs? (both dogs I mean)
    The way I see it... if theres a will, theres a way ;) I mean even the hands/knees problem, cant a really short guy stand while shes on her hands and knees?
    I guess thats just being overly argumentative though. We need a midget and a tall girl to conduct some test runs imo
  • edited October 2008
    ^Couples with significant height difference can try spooning or reverse cow girl.
  • edited October 2008
    Why not normal cowgirl?

    Reverse cowgirl is only for uglies who you don't want to see their face.
  • edited October 2008
    JayDub;38162 said:
    Why not normal cowgirl?

    Reverse cowgirl is only for uglies who you don't want to see their face.
    Wait a minute, isn't reverse cow girl the one where the guy lies on his back, and the girl, facing the guy, would straddle the guy and inserting his penis into her vagina?

    I mixed up sex positions, didn't I...
  • edited October 2008
    That's just the normal cowgirl, the reverse is similar but she is facing the other way so the guy would be looking at her back.
  • edited October 2008
    Well if a girl is with a short guy shes going to have to do a lot more work
  • edited October 2008
    Student0667;38163 said:
    Wait a minute, isn't reverse cow girl the one where the guy lies on his back, and the girl, facing the guy, would straddle the guy and inserting his penis into her vagina?

    I mixed up sex positions, didn't I...
    you mean anus right?
    who the hell would want to stick their penis in a vagina


    nasty
  • edited October 2008
    Triple;38170 said:
    you mean anus right?
    who the hell would want to stick their penis in a vagina


    nasty
    Quit confusing me!
  • edited October 2008
    If you tall people can't screw a midget, you need to practice. A 6 footers can fuck a 5 footers just fine.

    Some suggestion for short dude/tall chick:

    Semi-laying down doggie, the woman doesn't prop herself on her knees and arms

    Man standing, woman laying on bed face up.

    Woman on top works without any height restrictions.

    Tall dude/short chick, I don't need to explain that, that's easy to figure out.

    I totally agree about reverse cowgirl, totally reserved for ugly hot chick with fine ass.
  • edited October 2008
    6 footers can do 5 footers easily, when the taller one is the guy

    why are you so defencive? are you short or something?

    again as i said why dont you try letting some guy stick it in you, if you think height has no effect on sexual position comforts, not all girls want to be on top all of the time
  • edited October 2008
    mrbubbles;38176 said:
    Chill. Not defensive at all.



    Can't do that, I have a penis and I despise homosexuals. So yes, I lack some perspective as I'm not a woman.
    despise homosexuals eh
    that means your gay and trying not to be. just accept who you are or you'll never be happy.
  • edited October 2008
    you can always let a girl do you with a strap on then

    all i was trying to get at, which you admitted, was a different perspective

    men and women are pleased in different ways, all guys have to do is stick it in
  • edited October 2008
    randomuser;38179 said:
    all guys have to do is stick it in
    well...all girls have to do is just take it?
  • edited October 2008
    lazyGUY;38180 said:
    well...all girls have to do is just take it?
    if all girls do is just take it, they wont get off, theres internal mechanics involved, and short guys dont cut it for me, proportionality wise, and mechanically

    if you've had sex then you'd know it generally takes more for a girl to go than a guy
  • edited October 2008
    lol girls dont go and start activating "internal mechanics" in the middle of sex....if your turned on and hes doing it right...you have an orgasm...not rocket science
  • edited October 2008
    lazyGUY;38186 said:
    lol girls dont go and start activating "internal mechanics" in the middle of sex....if your turned on and hes doing it right...you have an orgasm...not rocket science
    She does if she's capable of vaginal orgasm, which is less than half of women. People put way too much emphasis on the skill of the male, when in reality girls either have vaginal orgasm or they don't. Obviously extreme ineptitude can be a factor, but most of the talk about guys not being "able" to give them an orgasm is just chicks not wanting to admit that they're just not able to do it. The majority of the 95% of women who can have orgasms at all, can only do it through direct clitoral stimulation, like masturbation or oral sex. It's the minority who are even capable of an orgasm through intercourse, for whom the skill of the guy might be a factor.
  • edited October 2008
    well when you simplify it too" all guys have to do is stick it in"....its not wrong to say all woman have to do is just take it

Leave a Comment