›
To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

BISC 101 or 102

xxk1nky
edited July 2008 in General
Yeah, kind of last minute. I took both Biology 11 and 12 when I was in highschool and enjoyed it. I just need to fulfill my science requirements. Which do you guys prefer? I'm leaning towards 102, either with Isabella Cote or Ivona Mladenovic.

Comments

  • Morro
    edited July 2008
    102 is easier, but you don't learn much. 101 is more material, but you'll walk out smarter.
  • randomuser
    edited July 2008
    if youre an arts student, there are non pure science, science desginated courses, but if youre biology inclined by all means..
  • xxk1nky
    edited July 2008
    randomuser;34169 said:
    if youre an arts student, there are non pure science, science desginated courses, but if youre biology inclined by all means..
    Yeah, I'm an Arts student. I've looked at some other ones (earth science) that are targeted for non-science people but I haven't seen much that really interests me.

    Plus, biology kind of works with my schedule. Kind of.
  • IVTIVT
    edited July 2008
    cmpt 165 by dist. ed.


    LOL
  • collegestudent
    edited July 2008
    ya 102 is definetly easier, i haven't had either of those profs though.
  • Morro
    edited July 2008
    Ivona Mladenovic is kind of a hardass. I don't know what sort of lecturer she is, but I had her as a lab instructor, and she was pretty meh. Don't know anything about the other one.

    www.ratemyprofessors.com is usually pretty solid.
  • Makall
    edited July 2008
    Don't take GEOG111 with Wiens.

    For sure, that course sucks balls.

Leave a Comment