To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Racial Slurs and Stereotypes

edited June 2008 in General
I never really understood why people get so offended when somebody uses a racial slur. Personally, somebody can call me a "chink" until they're blue in the face, and I really don't care. It doesn't harm my sense of worth, or make me feel like a second-class citizen. What it does do, is bring out the ignorance in the other person for using such language.

Now, with that said, I sometimes make racial slurs and enforce racial stereotypes, usually for shits and giggles. I find it funny to poke fun at such things. I can't think of any specifics, but as long as whoever you're directing it at also sees the humour in it, it should be okay. I'm sure I've heard the N-word thrown around a lot these days, probably one of the most used of these words, and it's just funny hearing non-black people referring to each other as "nigga" or something similar.

Especially living in Canada, where we have a wide variety of ethnic groups, you would hope that people aren't too bothered by these little comments, even if the person saying it is genuinely serious. Now, if you're not being admitted into a school because of your ethnicity, or not getting a job, yes, there's a problem. But what's the harm in using such language, for example, when talking to friends? Do you think there's a problem with it?
«1

Comments

  • edited June 2008
    My parents accused me of being racist when I explained what "ricer" meant after laughing at some random guy's car on the street.

    Personally, I don't have a problem with other people using racial slurs, but I generally won't use them myself. I really have no need, and they would just sound awkward.

    Also, I think it's much easier for non-whites to use racial slurs and get away with it. When a non-white person says "chink", or "nigger", or "cracker", people just assume that they are just joking around. When a white person says the same thing, I guarantee (unless they know the person well) that people are considering the possibility that they are a racist.
  • edited June 2008
    Well, nigger, sometimes racial slurs or insulting names can be quite hurtful. As a self-proclaimed homosexual, you of all people should understand these feelings better than any other chink.

    But in general, racial slurs should be "okayed" all around. Honestly, I've lost count of how many niggers I've called niggers.

    Oh. Another thing that's been killing me lately is how so many niggers are making it so easy to be niggers. Just in the past two weeks I've seen two separate incidents of niggers getting arrested. One was a squatter who was living in an abandoned store on Edmond, and another looked like a drug bust (what with all the black vehicles with dim sirens).

    Then there's the time we saw the nigger getting caught stealing a hat from the most red-neck looking dude I've ever seen.

    Seriously, I think god got tipsy recently or something, what with all the stereotype-lawls that I've seen.
  • edited June 2008
    I think it's okay if it's meant to be ironic and funny... like I don't think Russell Peters is racist. Personally I use the words "honger" and "nammer" a lot. But I could see why some people might be offended by some racial slurs, because implicitly the speaker is reinforcing negative meanings in terms like "nigger" and "chink" and making it okay and normal to use those terms in that way. (Didn't you take CMNS 304, Peter? Language shapes reality and the status quo? =P) As for stereotypes, I don't think there is a way we can avoid them--people will always put things into categories to make sense out of their surroundings. I do find it annoying though when people meet me and ask if I go to UBC for Science just because I'm Asian.
  • edited June 2008
    Hey at least they have a positive sterotype for you. Strong opinioned white woman is auto pinned into being in womans studies. Just once would I someone to assume I was great in sciences, and not a lesbain / bitch / feminist for speaking my mind
  • edited June 2008
    flo-ra;31921 said:
    Personally I think it's okay if it's meant to be ironic and funny... like I don't think Russell Peters is racist. But I could see why some people might be offended by some racial slurs, because implicitly the speaker is reinforcing negative meanings in terms like "nigger" and "chink" and making it okay and normal to use those terms in that way. (Didn't you take CMNS 304, Peter? Language shapes reality and the status quo? =P) As for stereotypes, I don't think there is a way we can avoid them--people will always put things into categories to make sense out of their surroundings. I do find it annoying though when people meet me and ask if I go to UBC for Science just because I'm Asian.
    Ahh, but what I'm saying is that if you begin to use those words in a non-negative way, in a humourous way (thus, framing it differently *CMNS 304W*), for example, then you can change the status quo. Which is what I think is beginning to happen here. As more people use it in a way that has little to no negative connotations to it, it just becomes another word.

    There's always the defense that, when we use a word like "nigger", we're using it to describe a negative situation/person. Ie. calling somebody a "nigger" because they did something stupid, for example. Now, you hear this a lot with the word "gay" or calling somebody a "fag" or "retard". Yes, it's used to describe something "stupid", let's say. So in that way, it's wrong? Well...the way I see it though, is that we use a lot of words in the english language that aren't to be taken literally. For example, saying something "sucks", doesn't mean that it is literally creating a vacuum. You use a word in place of "bad" or whatever in order to make your sentence more colourful. In the same way, calling somebody "fag" for doing something stupid doesn't mean you're a homophobe or that you don't respect gay people. It's just a fucking word. I could call them an "apple", but the meaning would be lost.
  • edited June 2008
    There is something vaguely voodoo-esque about this obsession with words. As though the words themselves have power, independent of the meaning they convey. I could care less if people use terms like whitey or honkey or cracker or whatever. It means nothing.

    Words like nigger are so steeped in cultural history, I almost understand the reaction some people have to it. But it goes too far when the word is seen as being an attack on an almost physical level. For example, after Michael Richards went nuts and yelled nigger a billion times at some black guys in the audience, they sued him for all sorts of money, on the grounds that they were caused huge amounts of distress and pain. Would they have been able to do that if he'd called them ugly, or stupid, or something? Of course not. That's when it's gone too far, IMO.
  • edited June 2008
    people are so over-sensitive in this politically correct world it's starting to be rediculous.
  • edited June 2008
    flo-ra;31921 said:
    I do find it annoying though when people meet me and ask if I go to UBC for Science just because I'm Asian.
    I'm not sure it's because you're asian, it might be because UBC is the first thing people in BC think of when they think of university.

    Every time I tell people I go to university, they respond with a "UBC?" and I'll have to say "no...SFU." Then if that person is feeling evil, he/she will add a "isn't UBC better than SFU?"
  • edited June 2008
    Magnificent_Bastard;31923 said:
    Ahh, but what I'm saying is that if you begin to use those words in a non-negative way, in a humourous way (thus, framing it differently *CMNS 304W*), for example, then you can change the status quo. Which is what I think is beginning to happen here. As more people use it in a way that has little to no negative connotations to it, it just becomes another word.

    There's always the defense that, when we use a word like "nigger", we're using it to describe a negative situation/person. Ie. calling somebody a "nigger" because they did something stupid, for example. Now, you hear this a lot with the word "gay" or calling somebody a "fag" or "retard". Yes, it's used to describe something "stupid", let's say. So in that way, it's wrong? Well...the way I see it though, is that we use a lot of words in the english language that aren't to be taken literally. For example, saying something "sucks", doesn't mean that it is literally creating a vacuum. You use a word in place of "bad" or whatever in order to make your sentence more colourful. In the same way, calling somebody "fag" for doing something stupid doesn't mean you're a homophobe or that you don't respect gay people. It's just a fucking word. I could call them an "apple", but the meaning would be lost.
    Why would the meaning be lost if you use "apple"? It's "just a fucking word" like "gay" or "Jew" right?

    Saying "that sucks" is different from "that's gay" because by saying the latter, you are implying that "gay" is inferior to "straight." You're attaching negative meanings to PEOPLE. Why don't you go around insulting people using "you're straight" or "you're Atheist"? If you say the meaning would be lost, then... well then tell me, how so?

    I understand that not everyone who uses these terms are actually homophobes or racists... it's simply become natural or "automatic" for some people to use them. And you're right, under certain frames, using those words would not be considered offensive. But I don't think it should be considered so "normal" to talk like this when it's far from being harmless in the big picture.
  • edited June 2008
    how about "thats lame"? Thats making fun of disabled people. omg oh noez...
    btw I get that a lot too,
    Asian dads/parents: "Engineering or sciences?"
    me: "criminology"
    them: "oh"
    -awkward silence-
    them: "thats not bad, go to law school, be a lawyer?"
    me: "no, don't plan to"
    them: "oh"
    -more awkward silence-
    me: "well I should get going!"
  • edited June 2008
    flo-ra;31948 said:
    Why would the meaning be lost if you use "apple"? It's "just a fucking word" like "gay" or "Jew" right?

    Saying "that sucks" is different from "that's gay" because by saying the latter, you are implying that "gay" is inferior to "straight." You're attaching negative meanings to PEOPLE. Why don't you go around insulting people using "you're straight" or "you're Atheist"? If you say the meaning would be lost, then... well then tell me, how so?

    I understand that not everyone who uses these terms are actually homophobes or racists... it's simply become natural or "automatic" for some people to use them. And you're right, under certain frames, using those words would not be considered offensive. But I don't think it should be considered so "normal" to talk like this when it's far from being harmless in the big picture.
    My point is that when somebody uses terms like "gay", "lame", "retarded", or whatever, the intention is not to demean homosexuals, disabled persons, or people with down syndrome. I'm sure the original usage of the words, when people first started saying it, meant that they associated homosexuals with negative thoughts, therefore they used the word "gay" to describe something negative. These days, when kids use it, I'm sure the intention isn't there anymore; it's just a word that's used to describe something negative. That's all it is, a word. It's a habit now. There's no right or wrong about it. People just use that word these days, along with "queer", "bastard", what have you. If there's no intention of harm or insult (to the group that the word pertains to, not the person you're calling a bastard or a queer), then there shouldn't be a problem

    I don't think homosexuals identify themselves with just the word itself. They're not just "gay", and that's that. It's their lifestyle, their values and morals, all of that. What I think is the problem is that people are greedy, and want to take ownership of those words. "It's OUR word, only we can use it". And they get all uptight whenever the word is used out of context, especially in a negative manner.
  • edited June 2008
    You know what is racist?

    Casting Goku in the new Dragonball movie as a white boy.

    Casting Leonardo DiCaprio as Akira in the new Akira movie when the setting is CLEARLY a post-apocalyptic Tokyo.

    Casting a white boy as the Prince of PERSIA in the new Prince of Persia movie.

    Throwing in a white boy in the new Jackie Chan and Jet Li movie when CLEARLY the setting is in a fictional Ancient China and as if Jackie Chan and Jet Li combined didn't have enough drawing power.

    There is this stereotype that Asian and Arabic men must be replaced by white boys. It's sickening.

    The only reason the white boy was in J&J's new movie was so that they can get the ASIAN GIRL. God forbid an ASIAN MAN get the ASIAN GIRL in a movie with a setting in ASIA.

    But they never match a BLACK GIRL with a WHITE BOY. LEAVE THE BOOTY TO THE BLACK MAN EH!? What happened to leaving the Asian girls to the Asian man?

    Why must the white man feel the need to rob us of our women? Have you not done enough!?
  • edited June 2008
    Just to be clear, I DON'T believe that all people who use racial slurs are racist. I realize that most people today use them with absolutely no intention of harm. However, I still think that the people who the words pertain to have a valid reason to feel offended. After all, as you said, we could have used any other word to describe negativity. So why do we discriminate certain groups over others, and make it okay for everyone to use terms that put them in a bad light?

    I don't care if people use the word "gay" to describe something flamboyant or metrosexual, but to substitute it for "stupid" or "unworthy" is something completely different. I can see why people would get offended even if the speaker doesn't intend to insult.

    It might be hard for you to understand how people could "overreact" over one little word. All I'm saying is that not everyone can brush it off as "just a word" like you can, and I think they have a good reason to fuss about it. Please don't ask if I have sand in my vagina. =P
  • edited June 2008
    My position on the use of racial slurs are still unclear. While I understood how harmful certain slurs are, however people still use it against other races on almost a daily basis. In fact, some racial slurs are even embraced by the target groups.

    Yeah, you tell me...
    Makall;31960 said:
    You know what is racist?

    Casting Goku in the new Dragonball movie as a white boy.

    ...

    Why must the white man feel the need to rob us of our women? Have you not done enough!?
    You forgot the movie 21. Where ALL Asians character in the book are played by white actors.
  • edited June 2008
    Makall;31960 said:
    You know what is racist?

    Casting Goku in the new Dragonball movie as a white boy.

    Casting Leonardo DiCaprio as Akira in the new Akira movie when the setting is CLEARLY a post-apocalyptic Tokyo.

    Casting a white boy as the Prince of PERSIA in the new Prince of Persia movie.

    Throwing in a white boy in the new Jackie Chan and Jet Li movie when CLEARLY the setting is in a fictional Ancient China and as if Jackie Chan and Jet Li combined didn't have enough drawing power.

    There is this stereotype that Asian and Arabic men must be replaced by white boys. It's sickening.

    The only reason the white boy was in J&J's new movie was so that they can get the ASIAN GIRL. God forbid an ASIAN MAN get the ASIAN GIRL in a movie with a setting in ASIA.

    But they never match a BLACK GIRL with a WHITE BOY. LEAVE THE BOOTY TO THE BLACK MAN EH!? What happened to leaving the Asian girls to the Asian man?

    Why must the white man feel the need to rob us of our women? Have you not done enough!?
    lets just be honest here... asian's can't act
  • edited June 2008
    Triple;31970 said:
    lets just be honest here... asian's can't act
    Damnit Triple! I am an Asian and I got a high school acting award back in Grade 10. Two years later, I ditched acting and become a history major...
  • edited June 2008
    flo-ra;31967 said:
    Just to be clear, I DON'T believe that all people who use racial slurs are racist. I realize that most people today use them with absolutely no intention of harm. However, I still think that the people who the words pertain to have a valid reason to feel offended. After all, as you said, we could have used any other word to describe negativity. So why do we discriminate certain groups over others, and make it okay for everyone to use terms that put them in a bad light?

    I don't care if people use the word "gay" to describe something flamboyant or metrosexual, but to substitute it for "stupid" or "unworthy" is something completely different. I can see why people would get offended even if the speaker doesn't intend to insult.

    It might be hard for you to understand how people could "overreact" over one little word. All I'm saying is that not everyone can brush it off as "just a word" like you can, and I think they have a good reason to fuss about it. Please don't ask if I have sand in my vagina. =P
    Fair enough. I just feel that the offense isn't as justified as, say, something that truly is discriminatory or prejudicial towards them. By comparison, it seems like something so insignificant, to just use the word "gay" in an innocent way. But having taken courses in intergroup relations, using such language is "oppressive" in nature, which is a theory I don't particularly subscribe to, but if it's in a textbook, it must be true!

    PS. Did you happen to go to the beach this past weekend? =P
  • edited June 2008
    Makall;31960 said:
    You know what is racist?

    Casting Goku in the new Dragonball movie as a white boy.

    Casting Leonardo DiCaprio as Akira in the new Akira movie when the setting is CLEARLY a post-apocalyptic Tokyo.

    Casting a white boy as the Prince of PERSIA in the new Prince of Persia movie.

    Throwing in a white boy in the new Jackie Chan and Jet Li movie when CLEARLY the setting is in a fictional Ancient China and as if Jackie Chan and Jet Li combined didn't have enough drawing power.

    There is this stereotype that Asian and Arabic men must be replaced by white boys. It's sickening.

    The only reason the white boy was in J&J's new movie was so that they can get the ASIAN GIRL. God forbid an ASIAN MAN get the ASIAN GIRL in a movie with a setting in ASIA.

    But they never match a BLACK GIRL with a WHITE BOY. LEAVE THE BOOTY TO THE BLACK MAN EH!? What happened to leaving the Asian girls to the Asian man?

    Why must the white man feel the need to rob us of our women? Have you not done enough!?
    Don't forget "The Last Samurai" with Tom Cruise.
  • edited June 2008
    kingsleymore;31977 said:
    Don't forget "The Last Samurai" with Tom Cruise.
    "The Mexican" with Brad Pitt.

    I've got a movie for you, how about this Hollywood: "The Last Nigger on Earth" starring Tom Hanks.

    /Thank you Dave Chappelle and Paul Mooney
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    flo-ra;31948 said:
    Why would the meaning be lost if you use "apple"? It's "just a fucking word" like "gay" or "Jew" right?

    Saying "that sucks" is different from "that's gay" because by saying the latter, you are implying that "gay" is inferior to "straight." You're attaching negative meanings to PEOPLE. Why don't you go around insulting people using "you're straight" or "you're Atheist"? If you say the meaning would be lost, then... well then tell me, how so?

    I understand that not everyone who uses these terms are actually homophobes or racists... it's simply become natural or "automatic" for some people to use them. And you're right, under certain frames, using those words would not be considered offensive. But I don't think it should be considered so "normal" to talk like this when it's far from being harmless in the big picture.
    you are forgetting that "gay" didn't always mean "homosexual". the language changes over time. Like so:
    Gay:
    Happy-->Homosexual-->Stupid/unpleasant--->???

    give it 30 years and "gay" will mean something else. then you'll be bitching about that too.
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    randomuser;31922 said:
    Hey at least they have a positive sterotype for you. Strong opinioned white woman is auto pinned into being in womans studies. Just once would I someone to assume I was great in sciences, and not a lesbain / bitch / feminist for speaking my mind
    its the WAY you speak your mind, sweetheart.
  • edited June 2008
    Makall;31960 said:
    You know what is racist?

    Casting Goku in the new Dragonball movie as a white boy.

    Casting Leonardo DiCaprio as Akira in the new Akira movie when the setting is CLEARLY a post-apocalyptic Tokyo.

    Casting a white boy as the Prince of PERSIA in the new Prince of Persia movie.

    Throwing in a white boy in the new Jackie Chan and Jet Li movie when CLEARLY the setting is in a fictional Ancient China and as if Jackie Chan and Jet Li combined didn't have enough drawing power.

    There is this stereotype that Asian and Arabic men must be replaced by white boys. It's sickening.

    The only reason the white boy was in J&J's new movie was so that they can get the ASIAN GIRL. God forbid an ASIAN MAN get the ASIAN GIRL in a movie with a setting in ASIA.

    But they never match a BLACK GIRL with a WHITE BOY. LEAVE THE BOOTY TO THE BLACK MAN EH!? What happened to leaving the Asian girls to the Asian man?

    Why must the white man feel the need to rob us of our women? Have you not done enough!?
    I like you.
  • edited June 2008
    we all know asian men can't fulfill a woman's need.
  • edited June 2008
    Makall;31960 said:

    The only reason the white boy was in J&J's new movie was so that they can get the ASIAN GIRL. God forbid an ASIAN MAN get the ASIAN GIRL in a movie with a setting in ASIA.
    And the white dudes watching this shit wants an Asian bitch. Thank god they're cleaning out the ugly fat ones.

    To the rest of your rant, Hollywood and American media perpetrates American value, one of those values is to devalue every other culture and rewrite non-American history with a white American lookin' man in it. You just can't do shit about it, well, you can by not going to the movies.

    On a entirely separate note, why the fuck do people still go on movie dates? That has got to be the most inefficient use of bonding time, sit in a front of a movie screen for an hour and half or more mesmerized by useless propaganda telling you how you should live your life. If anything, movie dates are the cheesiest idea for a date, it's inefficient, it's boring, you can't talk, shitty ripoff cinema food, and after the movie, disagreement over the topic, and lethargy after sitting down for two fucking hours. On the plus side, you get to cuddle, but there's better places to cuddle and go further without being arrested for sexual indecency.
  • edited June 2008
    mrbubbles;31991 said:
    ... but there's better places to cuddle and go further without being arrested for sexual indecency.
    Burger King?
  • edited June 2008
    Magnificent_Bastard;31973 said:
    Fair enough. I just feel that the offense isn't as justified as, say, something that truly is discriminatory or prejudicial towards them. By comparison, it seems like something so insignificant, to just use the word "gay" in an innocent way. But having taken courses in intergroup relations, using such language is "oppressive" in nature, which is a theory I don't particularly subscribe to, but if it's in a textbook, it must be true!

    PS. Did you happen to go to the beach this past weekend? =P
    Good, as long as you get my point... I don't care if you agree or not. =)
    And no I was not at the beach. Maybe you saw my friend who was there, apparently she looks exactly like me.
    IVT;31981 said:
    its the WAY you speak your mind, sweetheart.
    I don't think it's bitchy at all the way she argues her points. You can't blame her for defending her opinions forcefully when you do the same... in the end both sides aren't willing to open their ears to other perspectives. I share a lot of the views she does, I'm just not as vocal about them as she is... just because she's braver than I am, doesn't mean she's bitchier.
  • edited June 2008
    Magnificent_Bastard;31993 said:
    Burger King?
    revealing yourself in the ball room at mcdonalds is the best place
  • edited June 2008
    Why must the white man feel the need to rob us of our women? Have you not done enough!?
    Actually, I think they are officially our women, now.

    Plus, how dare you imply that white guys don't like black women. HOW DARE YOU?!? =P
  • edited June 2008
    Triple;31970 said:
    lets just be honest here... asian's can't act
    QUOTED FOR EMPHASIS

    It's something about the narrowed eyes--they're difficult to when it comes to expressing emotion.

    Plus, anything emotional in the Asian culture is just awkward.
  • edited June 2008
    flo-ra;31994 said:
    Good, as long as you get my point... I don't care if you agree or not. =)
    And no I was not at the beach. Maybe you saw my friend who was there, apparently she looks exactly like me.
    I was actually making a subtle suggestion that you may have gotten some sand in your vagina with that comment. =P

Leave a Comment