To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

CHEM122 / 126 STUDY SECTION

edited April 2007 in General
is it just me or does this term, there's no message board for lon capa.

so i'm here just to meet people in my lab days / lec so we can work on this dam chem together.

i'm monday lab, anyone else in the same boat?
«13

Comments

  • edited January 2007
    I'm Monday and Wednesday (11:30) lecture...
    I'm not taking 126 this semester.
    There's a msg board for the 122 capa... I don't know about the 126 though.
    We should make a group on facebook or.... use this forum as a help section or something.
  • edited January 2007
    i have the same lectures as you. but i thought 126 was a co-requisite..

    and yep that's the plan, this is the help section for this subject/course for term 1071 winter.
  • edited January 2007
    corequisite!?!?!
    whaaaaaaaaat...
    uh oh... =/
    why would it let me enrol just in 122 then..?
    hopefully i can take it in the summer :S
  • edited January 2007
    i'm not in either of these classes, but have looked into them...

    correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't Chem 126 the lab component to Chem 122?

    this is taken from the Chem 122 course outline,
    "Students who intend to take further courses in physical or inorganic chemistry should take the laboratory course CHEM 126 concurrently with 122."
  • edited January 2007
    126 isn't required to be in the same semester. However, IF you take it in the same semester, and you drop 122, you will be dropped from 126. Be aware of this.
  • edited January 2007
    I e-mailed Ken MacFarlene the advisor of the chem department..
    he said it was ok.. It's only a suggested corequisite because the things in 126 and 122 go together so it'll be easier if you take in the same semester.

    but yeah, i'll take it in summer. :)
  • edited January 2007
    yeah i'm glad it worked out! :)

    and a four hour lab just looks so unappealing on top of the class and tutorial!
  • edited January 2007
    tutorial isn't mandatory for this one. but they're actually helpful.
  • edited January 2007
    ...at least the TA can speak english in 122....
  • edited January 2007
    anyone want to do the lecture loncapa tomorrow.
  • edited January 2007
    dont they have discussion post up there?
  • edited January 2007
    Hey, at least *I* speak English properly, too. :tongue:
  • edited January 2007
    NukeChem said:
    Hey, at least *I* speak English properly, too. :tongue:
    EYE can speak english properly too.

    anyone in chem122 tutorial on wednesday130. see you there foos.
  • edited January 2007
    ok i could use some help..

    For loncapa exp 3 last question...the slope..i graphed the thing..and use excel to gimme the slope of the line that average the points... but its wrong.. WHY!!!!
  • edited January 2007
    You have to be careful about how many sig. figs you put in. I had a similar situation where a guy used some program other than Excel to graph the points and get the slope and intercept and it kept rejecting the slope. When I had him redo it with Excel it worked fine.

    In addition be careful to let Excel carry all the sig figs internally so the errors don't magnify too much when you plot with the Add Trendline bit (You need to make it an X-Y scatter plot, don't force through zero).

    Make sure you've got the right axes, too. If your axes are flipped your slope will be wrong.
  • w2k
    edited January 2007
    Im also in chem122. Awsome to see a thread for this! I'll start posting more often!
  • edited January 2007
    lol...i hate 126...too much work for a 2 credit course
  • edited January 2007
    Meh. Chemistry and Physics labs are always like that. :tongue:

    Anyway this week it's a whack of equlibrium stuff so make sure you all understand equilibrium! :smile:
  • edited January 2007
    ...chemical equlibrium....

    OMFG....
  • w2k
    edited February 2007
    Had to miss this whole week of chem to make up for loss time at work (had to line up for a passport). Looks like I better do some extra reviewing.

    I noticed on this week's capa theres a few ppl that is talking about their aurora calculators. Did anyone of you actually get one? Are we only allowed to use these calcs for the MT/Final? If so I better get one ASAP.
  • edited February 2007
    yup...those are the only ones allowed
  • edited February 2007
    Hey all.

    Iron thiocyanate is fun. It's also blood-red in color. :tongue:

    Anyway, remember - K values are dimensionless. And again, please be aware of equilibrium, its temperature dependence and Le Chatelier.
  • edited February 2007
    Lab 6 is potassium bitartrate. Be aware of statistical techniques for eliminating outliers in a collection of data points, and understand the difference between solubility and the equilibrium constant (the first is concentration dependent and the second is temperature dependent).

    And do yourselves a favor and look up the molar mass of potassium bitartrate. :)
  • edited February 2007
    Lab 7 will focus on simple acid-base equilibria. Read the Appendixes regarding acids and bases and be familiar with the graphs showing the different titration shapes.

    In addition, be conscious of the fact that in a mixture of acids with one strong and the other weak, the weak acid is in equilibrium. Consider the effect on a weak acid when you flood the solution with a large amount of H+ ions. You did something similiar to this in the bitartrate lab where the common ion effect shifted the position of the equilibrium.

    Also, when you titrate, try not to overshoot the endpoint. The most common problem in manual titrations is going too fast and not being careful enough with adding dropwise from the buret. In such situations you may find that twisting the orange nut on the stopcock to increase the resistance to turning will help you.
  • edited February 2007
    Lab 8's already been posted on the CHEM 126 website for next week, so I'll make a few notes about it now --

    WRITE THOSE VALUES IN YOUR LAB BOOK. Writing them in your lab manual is not acceptable. IN YOUR BOOK, PLEASE. Additionally, there is no such thing as the pKa or pKb for a strong acid or base. As well, pKa + pKb = 14. Use this to get BOTH the pKa and pKb for the weak acids/bases/salts that you have been asked to work out.

    I will update this when I have a little more time as I've got to rush off somewhere.
  • edited February 2007
    exp 7 was a bitch....
  • edited February 2007
    An update - for lab 8, you'll more than likely need to use the analytical balance to weigh your samples, as otherwise you just won't have the accuracy needed for subsequent calculations.

    As well, you have probably learned that using the computer to do pH titrations involves a compromise between getting a good curve and taking too much time acquiring the data. In general the rule of thumb is in the flat range, go 0.5 mL between points, and in sharp transition ranges, 0.1 mL between points.
  • edited February 2007
    ...thanks nukechem...
  • w2k
    edited February 2007
    GL all tomorrow. I know I'll be having a long date tonight with chem after work.
  • edited February 2007
    Hey all,

    Saw a bunch of you folks outside the 122 classroom waiting for the midterm. How 'bout the inevitable post-mortem? :)

    (and PS, if it helps, I was wishing good karma on you all. :smile: )

Leave a Comment